Services

Bounded ways to bring senior technical judgment into the room.

Each engagement is designed to clarify technical risk, improve decision quality, and avoid open-ended consulting sprawl.

How to choose

Start with a diagnostic when the real risk is unclear.
Use advisory when technical decisions keep recurring.
Use scoped leadership when the company needs temporary technical direction.

01

Technical Risk Diagnostic

A fixed-scope diagnostic for founder-led teams that need a sharper read on architecture, delivery, reliability, or scaling risk before assumptions harden.

Ideal format

Usually a short fixed-scope engagement, often one to two focused weeks.

Decision value

Leadership leaves with a clearer view of what is risky, what is manageable, and what should happen next.

Who it's for

Founder-led teams facing technical drag or architecture uncertainty before a major hire, re-org, leadership change, or platform reset.

Problem it solves

Turns vague technical concern into a clear view of risk, priority, and the next 90 days.

Included

  • Leadership and engineering interviews
  • Architecture, codebase, and delivery review
  • Technical risk register
  • Decision memo and 90-day priorities
  • Executive debrief with next-step options

Explicitly not included

Open-ended implementation work
Commodity staff augmentation
Embedded management role

02

Strategic Engineering Advisor

Recurring senior advisory support for founders and engineering leaders who want a trusted technical counterpart for high-stakes decisions.

Ideal format

Typically a monthly advisory retainer with a clear operating rhythm.

Decision value

Leaders make sharper technical decisions with less thrash and a steadier scaling path.

Who it's for

Founders and engineering leaders who need ongoing technical judgment without immediately adding a full-time executive hire.

Problem it solves

Creates a steady place for architecture, reliability, delivery, and hiring decisions to be pressure-tested before they become expensive.

Included

  • Recurring advisory cadence with leadership
  • Architecture and delivery reviews
  • Reliability, modernization, and technical-direction support
  • Hiring and role-design guidance
  • Decision support for major tradeoffs or resets

Explicitly not included

Daily sprint management
Outsourced delivery ownership
Agency-style project team

03

Scoped Fractional CTO

A bounded period of senior technical leadership for a company that needs more than advisory support, but not a permanent CTO substitute.

Ideal format

A scoped engagement with explicit goals, boundaries, and exit criteria.

Decision value

The company gets clearer technical direction, cleaner leadership expectations, and a credible handoff plan.

Who it's for

Teams in a transition, scaling inflection, modernization phase, or temporary technical leadership gap.

Problem it solves

Provides senior technical direction for a defined phase while building toward durable internal ownership.

Included

  • Executive-level technical direction and prioritization
  • Leadership coaching and engineering cadence support
  • Hiring calibration and role design
  • Board or investor-ready technical framing
  • A path toward durable internal ownership

Explicitly not included

Permanent CTO replacement
Unbounded rescue work
Catch-all implementation ownership

04

Technical Diligence Advisory

Independent technical diligence and post-investment support for investors and operators who need a practical read on technical risk and near-term priorities.

Ideal format

Transaction-specific support or recurring advisory work with platform teams.

Decision value

Sharper investment judgment and a more credible technical value-creation agenda.

Who it's for

Investors, operating partners, and portfolio teams that need more than a surface-level engineering readout.

Problem it solves

Translates technical complexity into a clearer view of downside, leadership dependency, and near-term value-creation priorities.

Included

  • Technical and leadership assessment
  • Risk and opportunity memo
  • Post-close priority framing
  • Targeted founder or portfolio support
  • Plain-language synthesis for non-technical stakeholders

Explicitly not included

Financial or legal diligence
Generic vendor-generated report
Opinion without practical prioritization

Next Step

If the technical direction feels risky, start with the decision.

Book a short Technical Risk Intro Call focused on the specific architecture, delivery, or scaling concern in front of you.